Map Strategy Picker
Pick a map, see at a glance how each of the four classes performs on it — the fit rating, the tactical role, and the weapon-range match. Data is consolidated from the per-unit cards on each map’s full guide, with no editorial additions.
Updated
Data Source and Coverage #
Where this comes from
The fit ratings (Strong / Good / Mixed / Poor) and tactical descriptions are extracted verbatim from the per-unit cards on each map’s full guide. The picker is a consolidation tool, not a source of new judgments — if it says “Sniper: Poor fit on DMArena,” that label exists on /maps/dmarena.html already.
Map coverage status
- DMArena — All 4 classes have explicit fit ratings on the map page. Full data shown.
- Administration HQ — All 4 classes have explicit fit ratings on the map page. Full data shown.
- Upper Platforms — Only Sniper has an explicit fit signal (“Sniper-friendly Domination map” in the page’s own meta description). The other three classes have tactical role labels but no codified fit rating — the picker shows those as Role documented rather than inventing a Strong/Good/Mixed/Poor label. Read the full Upper Platforms guide for context.
Why no synthesized labels for Upper Platforms? The two missing fit ratings (Enforcer and Infiltrator) could be inferred from the tactical descriptions, but inferring a label is editorial judgment, not extraction. Until those ratings are codified on the map page itself, the picker treats them as documented-but-not-rated and links readers back to the full guide for context. If the map page later adopts the explicit fit-label schema across all four classes, the picker will pick it up automatically on the next deploy.